Parks & Braxton, PA: Miami DUI Lawyer | Criminal Defense

OUR RECENT DUI VICTORIES

The following is a list of the firm’s most recent DUI wins. Parks & Braxton provides the case number, the judge’s name, as well as the date the DUI was won for authenticity purposes.
Aug 15, 2005 Case: CT-731360-X Judge Barber
Facts: The defendant was stopped by police as he was parked half on a curb and half on the road. He was passed out behind the wheel sitting on his keys. The officer noticed he could not stand, had an odor of alcohol, and very slurred speech. He performed poorly on roadside tests and blew a .149 in the breath machine. Everything was on video tape.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 9, 2005 Case: 508542-X Judge Krieger-Martin
Facts: The defendant was stopped for running a red light and driving at a high rate of speed. The officers observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. The DUI officer alleged the defendant performed poorly on roadside tests in his reports. The defendant refused the breath test.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 9, 2005 Case: 508542-X Judge Krieger-Martin
Facts: The defendant was stopped for running a red light and driving at a high rate of speed. The officers observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. The DUI officer alleged the defendant performed poorly on roadside tests in his reports. The defendant refused the breath test.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 8, 2005 Case: 062669-J Judge Mills-Francis
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving on the wrong side of the road. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and unsteadiness. No roadside tests were conducted for safety reasons on the road. The defendant blew a .183 in the breath machine after his arrest for DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 8, 2005 Case: 062669-J Judge Mills-Francis
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving on the wrong side of the road. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and unsteadiness. No roadside tests were conducted for safety reasons on the road. The defendant blew a .183 in the breath machine after his arrest for DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 7, 2005 Case: 04-034342TCA08 Judge Damico
Facts: The defendant was stopped for weaving. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol and she admitted to drinking wine. She allegedly performed poorly on field sobriety tests on video and blew a .17 in the breath machine after her arrest for DUI.
Result: The DUI was dismissed.
Aug 7, 2005 Case: 04-034342TCA08 Judge Damico
Facts: The defendant was stopped for weaving. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol and she admitted to drinking wine. She allegedly performed poorly on field sobriety tests on video and blew a .17 in the breath machine after her arrest for DUI.
Result: The DUI was dismissed.
Aug 3, 2005 Case: 2004-CT-001365-A Judge Blechman
Facts: The defendant was stopped for weaving. Once stopped, the officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and unsteadiness. He performed poorly on roadside tests and blew a .193 in the breath machine after his arrest for DUI. This was the defendant's third offense.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 3, 2005 Case: 2004-CT-001365-A Judge Blechman
Facts: The defendant was stopped for weaving. Once stopped, the officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and unsteadiness. He performed poorly on roadside tests and blew a .193 in the breath machine after his arrest for DUI. This was the defendant's third offense.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Jul 27, 2005 Case: 04-019541MM10A (JURY TRIAL) Judge Lazarus
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving 93mph in a 65mph zone. The defendant was seen placing a beer can in the back seat of the truck. The Trooper later searched the vehicle and found beer cans in the back seat. The Trooper pulled out the beer cans on video. The defendant first denied drinking, and later admitted to drinking. The Trooper testified in trial that the defendant failed the sobriety tests including the one leg stand which he discontinued for no reason. The Trooper also testified that the defendant fell back on the walk and turn test. The defendant was subsequently arrested for DUI, and open container.
Result: The defendant was found NOT GUILTY.
Jul 27, 2005 Case: 04-019541MM10A (JURY TRIAL) Judge Lazarus
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving 93mph in a 65mph zone. The defendant was seen placing a beer can in the back seat of the truck. The Trooper later searched the vehicle and found beer cans in the back seat. The Trooper pulled out the beer cans on video. The defendant first denied drinking, and later admitted to drinking. The Trooper testified in trial that the defendant failed the sobriety tests including the one leg stand which he discontinued for no reason. The Trooper also testified that the defendant fell back on the walk and turn test. The defendant was subsequently arrested for DUI, and open container.
Result: The defendant was found NOT GUILTY.
Jul 26, 2005 Case: 05-006538TCA04 (JURY TRIAL) Judge Moyle
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. Once stopped, the officer observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, a flushed face and slow speech. He testified the defendant was swaying and walking "gingerly." The defendant performed the walk and turn and one leg stand exercises at the scene. He could not do the one leg stand and put his foot down several times. He was video taped at the scene and at the station after his arrest. He refused the breath test and this was the defendant's second offense.
Result: The Jury found the defendant NOT GUILTY in twenty minutes.
Jul 26, 2005 Case: 05-006538TCA04 (JURY TRIAL) Judge Moyle
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. Once stopped, the officer observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, a flushed face and slow speech. He testified the defendant was swaying and walking "gingerly." The defendant performed the walk and turn and one leg stand exercises at the scene. He could not do the one leg stand and put his foot down several times. He was video taped at the scene and at the station after his arrest. He refused the breath test and this was the defendant's second offense.
Result: The Jury found the defendant NOT GUILTY in twenty minutes.
Jul 25, 2005 Case: 086441-J Judge Mills-Francis
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. Once stopped, the officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech and bloodshot eyes. He noticed the defendant to stagger and perform poorly on roadside tests. The defendant refused the breath test.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Jul 25, 2005 Case: CT-728275-X Judge Thomas
Facts: The defendant was involved in an accident in which he crashed into an apartment complex gate. The officer at the scene noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and he was unsteady. He admitted to consuming a couple of beers and was transported to the hospital for his injuries. At the hospital, a DUI officer arrived and asked to him to volunteer to give a blood test to determine his alcohol level and the defendant agreed. The DUI officer noticed the same observations as the first officer. He was not arrested at that time because the officer was going to wait for the blood results to see if they were over the legal limit of .08. After the blood was analyzed, the results were a .139 (over the legal limit) and the defendant was subsequently arrested by the same DUI officer.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Jul 25, 2005 Case: 086441-J Judge Mills-Francis
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. Once stopped, the officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech and bloodshot eyes. He noticed the defendant to stagger and perform poorly on roadside tests. The defendant refused the breath test.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Jul 25, 2005 Case: CT-728275-X Judge Thomas
Facts: The defendant was involved in an accident in which he crashed into an apartment complex gate. The officer at the scene noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and he was unsteady. He admitted to consuming a couple of beers and was transported to the hospital for his injuries. At the hospital, a DUI officer arrived and asked to him to volunteer to give a blood test to determine his alcohol level and the defendant agreed. The DUI officer noticed the same observations as the first officer. He was not arrested at that time because the officer was going to wait for the blood results to see if they were over the legal limit of .08. After the blood was analyzed, the results were a .139 (over the legal limit) and the defendant was subsequently arrested by the same DUI officer.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Jul 15, 2005 Case: 05-010227TCA04 Judge Moyle
Facts: The defendant was stopped for failing to move over for a police vehicle. Once stopped, the officer observed an odor of alcohol and she performed poorly on roadside tests according to the officer. She then blew a .153 in the breath machine.
Result: The DUI was dismissed.
Jul 15, 2005 Case: 05-010227TCA04 Judge Moyle
Facts: The defendant was stopped for failing to move over for a police vehicle. Once stopped, the officer observed an odor of alcohol and she performed poorly on roadside tests according to the officer. She then blew a .153 in the breath machine.
Result: The DUI was dismissed.
Jul 11, 2005 Case: CT-2732-XAM Judge Fernandez
Facts: The defendant was stopped for weaving all over the road. The officer noticed and odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant stated she had several drinks. She performed poorly on roadside tests according to the officer on video and then blew a .098 (above the legal limit) in the breath machine after her arrest for DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.

OBTAIN IMMEDIATE LEGAL HELP

To save your license, you must act within 10 days. Get in touch with our firm by calling 904.450.5220, or fill out the form here.
OBTAIN IMMEDIATE LEGAL HELP
To save your license, you must act within 10 days. Get in touch with our firm by calling 904.450.5220, or fill out the form here.

DUI

PRACTICE

AREAS

I BLEW OVER A 0.08
CAN I WIN MY CASE?

Knowing your rights when being arrested can be the key to a favorable outcome to your case.

WHY HIRE
PARKS & BRAXTON,PA?

With over 4 decades of experience on both sides of the law, we offer strategies for a solid defense

YOU ONLY HAVE 10 DAYS TO GET YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE BACK

Get you free case evaluation from one of our attorneys within minutes.

Offices Located Throughout the State of Florida