Parks & Braxton, PA: Miami DUI Lawyer | Criminal Defense

ALSO SERVING ST. JOHNS, CLAY, FLAGLER, NASSAU COUNTIES
904.450.5220
Call 24/7 Nights, Weekends & Holidays
Free Consultations
ALSO SERVING ST. JOHNS, CLAY, FLAGLER, NASSAU COUNTIES
904.450.5220
Call 24/7 Nights, Weekends & Holidays
Free Consultations
Call
Email
Map

OUR RECENT DUI VICTORIES

The following is a list of the firm’s most recent DUI wins. Parks & Braxton provides the case number, the judge’s name, as well as the date the DUI was won for authenticity purposes.
May 8, 2024 Case: 22-010942CF10A Judge Bailey
Facts: The defendant was drinking at a bar when another patron offered to give him a ride home. Despite his excessive level of intoxication, the defendant realized that the individual driving the car was going in the wrong direction. An argument subsequently ensued that eventually became physical. The driver pulled into a gas station several miles down the road and exited the car. The defendant then jumped into the driver's seat and tried to get away. The original driver jumped into the passenger side and began to strike the defendant in the face. They subsequently crashed into the gas station. Upon arrival, several officers observed a strong odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes as well as extremely slurred speech. In addition, the defendant's face was covered in blood. He was arrested for felony DUI third offense as well as Grand Theft Auto. The defendant had a blood alcohol level of .40 (5 times the legal limit) as well as tested positive for cannabis.
Defense: Parks & Braxton took the case over for another lawyer and began to piece together a necessity defense. Specifically, Florida law allows an individual to commit a crime if the offense they committed is outweighed by the harm the were trying to avoid. In this case, the defendant jumped into the driver's seat and attempted to drive away in an effort to avoid being physically battered by the owner of the vehicle. Through our investigation it was revealed that the owner of the car had been a boxer for over twenty years. In addition, based on the officers' body worn camera, it was clear that the defendant's facial injuries were not from the crash, but rather from being beaten by the owner of the car. There was clearly no intent to steal the vehicle. In addition, while the defendant was in the driver's seat at the time of the crash, it was merely in an effort to avoid the greater harm of being assaulted. The felonies were all dismissed.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
May 7, 2024 Case: 23-CT-012492 Judge Farr
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/glassy eyes, slurred speech, and fumbling fingers. She also appeared slightly unsteady on her feet. She refused to perform roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test.
Defense: On video, the defendant's speech was not slurred and she was not unsteady. In fact, none of her normal faculties were impaired. After discussions with the State, they Dropped the DUI, the defendant received no criminal conviction, and no penalties other than court costs.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
May 7, 2024 Case: 23-CT-012492 Judge Farr
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/glassy eyes, slurred speech, and fumbling fingers. She also appeared slightly unsteady on her feet. She refused to perform roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test.
Defense: On video, the defendant's speech was not slurred and she was not unsteady. In fact, none of her normal faculties were impaired. After discussions with the State, they Dropped the DUI, the defendant received no criminal conviction, and no penalties other than court costs.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
May 6, 2024 Case: 23-CT-057677 Judge Atkin
Facts: The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end crash in which airbags deployed. When officers arrived, they found the defendant unconscious (sleeping) in the rear back seat of his vehicle. After several attempts to awaken him, they noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, and he was very unsteady. Officers determined that he was the driver as he had seat belt markings from his left shoulder and there was blood on his hands consistent with the blood on the steering wheel. In addition, he had airbag burns on his arms and it was the front driver's side airbag that deployed. After he was confronted with this evidence, he admitted to having been the driver that rear ended the other car. He performed poorly on field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .148 and .141 in the breath machine.
Defense: After several conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
May 6, 2024 Case: 24-CT-011433 Judge Atkin
Facts: The defendant was stopped for making a right on red without stopping and following too closely. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and he stated he had drank "a couple." His eyes were bloodshot, he fumbled with his documents, and he appeared unsteady. The defendant then performed various roadside tests such as the walk and turn, one leg stand, finger to nose, finger count, and HGN (eye test). He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense: After several conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
May 6, 2024 Case: 23-CT-057677 Judge Atkin
Facts: The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end crash in which airbags deployed. When officers arrived, they found the defendant unconscious (sleeping) in the rear back seat of his vehicle. After several attempts to awaken him, they noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, and he was very unsteady. Officers determined that he was the driver as he had seat belt markings from his left shoulder and there was blood on his hands consistent with the blood on the steering wheel. In addition, he had airbag burns on his arms and it was the front driver's side airbag that deployed. After he was confronted with this evidence, he admitted to having been the driver that rear ended the other car. He performed poorly on field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .148 and .141 in the breath machine.
Defense: After several conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
May 6, 2024 Case: 24-CT-011433 Judge Atkin
Facts: The defendant was stopped for making a right on red without stopping and following too closely. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and he stated he had drank "a couple." His eyes were bloodshot, he fumbled with his documents, and he appeared unsteady. The defendant then performed various roadside tests such as the walk and turn, one leg stand, finger to nose, finger count, and HGN (eye test). He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense: After several conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
May 1, 2024 Case: 24-CT-0144409 Judge T. Brown
Facts: The defendant was found slumped over the wheel of his running car in a turning lane. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and slurred speech. His dexterity was fumbled as well. He performed poorly on field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .149 and .136 in the breath machine.
Defense: After several conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
May 1, 2024 Case: 23-CT-055747 Judge Musselman
Facts: The defendant was stopped after leaving a closed park after hours. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, slow speech, and bloodshot eyes. He also swayed, stumbled, and staggered. He performed various roadside tests such as the walk and turn, one leg stand, and count backwards. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .202 and .202 in the breath machine.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
May 1, 2024 Case: 23-CM-011148 Judge Rich
Facts: The defendant crashed his car into a concrete barrier. Upon arrival, officers noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and thick-tongued speech. The defendant refused to perform field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense: When a defendant refuses to perform field sobriety tests, an officer must advise them of the adverse consequences for refusing. For example, the officer must state something like, "I am going to have base my decision to arrest you on what I have observed so far if you refuse." In addition, the officer can state to the defendant that their refusal can be used against them in court. If they do not give any adverse consequences, the refusal will be excluded from evidence. Here, the officer did not give the defendant any adverse consequences. After negotiations short of trial, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
May 1, 2024 Case: 23-CM-011148 Judge Rich
Facts: The defendant crashed his car into a concrete barrier. Upon arrival, officers noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and thick-tongued speech. The defendant refused to perform field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense: When a defendant refuses to perform field sobriety tests, an officer must advise them of the adverse consequences for refusing. For example, the officer must state something like, "I am going to have base my decision to arrest you on what I have observed so far if you refuse." In addition, the officer can state to the defendant that their refusal can be used against them in court. If they do not give any adverse consequences, the refusal will be excluded from evidence. Here, the officer did not give the defendant any adverse consequences. After negotiations short of trial, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
May 1, 2024 Case: 24-CT-0144409 Judge T. Brown
Facts: The defendant was found slumped over the wheel of his running car in a turning lane. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and slurred speech. His dexterity was fumbled as well. He performed poorly on field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .149 and .136 in the breath machine.
Defense: After several conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
May 1, 2024 Case: 23-CT-055747 Judge Musselman
Facts: The defendant was stopped after leaving a closed park after hours. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, slow speech, and bloodshot eyes. He also swayed, stumbled, and staggered. He performed various roadside tests such as the walk and turn, one leg stand, and count backwards. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .202 and .202 in the breath machine.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Apr 30, 2024 Case: 23-CT-016448 Judge Farr
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving erratically. She was swerving all over the road. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, watery/glassy eyes and slurred speech. She then performed various roadside tests such as HGN (eye test), the walk and turn, and one leg stand. She was subsequently arrested for DUI and later blew a .159 and .157 in the breath machine.
Defense: After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Apr 30, 2024 Case: 23-CT-016778 Judge Farr
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving the wrong way on a one-way street. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. She also had a red face, appeared unsteady, and admitted to having consumed alcohol. She refused to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test.
Defense: Many aspects of the video contradicted the police reports. Her speech was not slurred, she was not unsteady, and was very responsive and coherent. After negotiations, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Apr 30, 2024 Case: 23-CT-016448 Judge Farr
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving erratically. She was swerving all over the road. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, watery/glassy eyes and slurred speech. She then performed various roadside tests such as HGN (eye test), the walk and turn, and one leg stand. She was subsequently arrested for DUI and later blew a .159 and .157 in the breath machine.
Defense: After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Apr 30, 2024 Case: 23-CT-016778 Judge Farr
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving the wrong way on a one-way street. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. She also had a red face, appeared unsteady, and admitted to having consumed alcohol. She refused to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test.
Defense: Many aspects of the video contradicted the police reports. Her speech was not slurred, she was not unsteady, and was very responsive and coherent. After negotiations, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Apr 29, 2024 Case: 23-CT-503748 Judge Swett
Facts: The defendant crashed his truck into a police car while police were on scene blocking off a road for an unrelated traffic crash. Officers observed a faint odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, a dazed/blank look, and he appeared sleepy. While outside of the car, he staggered, appeared unsteady, and had slow speech. The defendant agreed to perform the HGN (eye test) and then refused to perform any other roadside tests. He told the officers to "just arrest him." They did arrest him for DUI and he later refused a breath test.
Defense: On tape, the defendant was not unsteady, did not stagger, and his speech appeared normal. It was obvious from the tapes that the police arrested him for DUI because they were angry about the crash. After conversations with the State regarding the evidence, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Apr 29, 2024 Case: 23-CT-503748 Judge Swett
Facts: The defendant crashed his truck into a police car while police were on scene blocking off a road for an unrelated traffic crash. Officers observed a faint odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, a dazed/blank look, and he appeared sleepy. While outside of the car, he staggered, appeared unsteady, and had slow speech. The defendant agreed to perform the HGN (eye test) and then refused to perform any other roadside tests. He told the officers to "just arrest him." They did arrest him for DUI and he later refused a breath test.
Defense: On tape, the defendant was not unsteady, did not stagger, and his speech appeared normal. It was obvious from the tapes that the police arrested him for DUI because they were angry about the crash. After conversations with the State regarding the evidence, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Apr 25, 2024 Case: 23-CT-006276 Judge Curington
Facts: The defendant was stopped for weaving and drifting over the lanes of travel, driving on the lane itself, and also on fog line multiple times. The officer observed an odor of alcohol. He appeared jittery, had slow reflexes, and had slurred speech. He also had a sway to his stance and fumbled for his door latch. He refused to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. The defendant subsequently refused a breath test.
Defense: On video tape, his speech was not slurred, he did not appear jittery, did not sway, and exhibited normal reflexes. Furthermore, the officer told him upon stopping him that he recorded a large portion of the driving pattern. That was not true and no driving pattern was on any video tape. The State Dropped the DUI and he received no conviction on his record.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.

OBTAIN IMMEDIATE LEGAL HELP

To save your license, you must act within 10 days. Get in touch with our firm by calling 904.450.5220, or fill out the form here.
OBTAIN IMMEDIATE LEGAL HELP
To save your license, you must act within 10 days. Get in touch with our firm by calling 904.450.5220, or fill out the form here.

DUI

PRACTICE

AREAS

CDL License
DMV Hearings
DUI & Drugs
DUI Involving an Accident
DUI Penalties
Felony DUI
Breathalyzer Tests
First Time Offenders
Drivers License Restoration
Multiple DUI
Out of State DUI
Sobriety Checkpoints
DUI With Injury
How Strong Is Your Case?
Leaving the Scene

I BLEW OVER A 0.08
CAN I WIN MY CASE?

Knowing your rights when being arrested can be the key to a favorable outcome to your case.

WHY HIRE
PARKS & BRAXTON,PA?

With over 4 decades of experience on both sides of the law, we offer strategies for a solid defense

YOU ONLY HAVE 10 DAYS TO GET YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE BACK

Get you free case evaluation from one of our attorneys within minutes.

Offices Located Throughout the State of Florida