Parks & Braxton, PA: Miami DUI Lawyer | Criminal Defense | DUI Wins

OUR RECENT DUI VICTORIES

The following is a list of the firm’s most recent DUI wins. Parks & Braxton provides the case number, the judge’s name, as well as the date the DUI was won for authenticity purposes.

Feb 13, 2025	Case: 24-CT-012747	Judge Scott
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding (83mph in a 55mph zone). Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/watery eyes, and slurred speech. She also appeared unsteady and had fumbling fingers. The defendant refused to perform field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense:	The firm pointed out to the State prior to trial that the defendant was not unsteady and had no slurred speech on tape. After negotiations, the State Dropped her Second DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 13, 2025	Case: 24-CT-014431	Judge Scott
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for almost crashing into an officer by violating his right of way. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and a tired/lethargic balance. He also had poor balance and admitted to drinking beer. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .110 and .110 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 12, 2025	Case: A77GXKE	Judge Vaccaro
Facts:	Police got a call about a suspicious vehicle on the side of the highway. When the trooper arrived, he saw the defendant's vehicle on the side of the highway. At the same time, the defendant was inside an ambulance being evaluated by paramedics. The road ranger told the trooper that the defendant was sitting the driver's seat when he arrived. Officers made contact with the defendant and noticed an odor of alcohol, lack of balance, and thick tongued speech. He also had red/bloodshot eyes. He refused to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .243 and .235 in the breath machine.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton filed a pretrial motion to suppress the lawfulness of the arrest. In our motion, we alleged that under Florida Statute 901.15, when there is no crash, an officer must observe every element of a misdemeanor crime "in their presence." Here, the officer did not observe the defendant driving or in actual physical control when he arrived (i.e., the first element of a DUI). A civilian road ranger is not an officer so the fellow officer rule does not apply. After conversations with the State about the legal issue, the DUI was Dismissed.
Result:	The DUI was dismissed.

Feb 12, 2025	Case: A77GXKE	Judge Vaccaro
Facts:	Police got a call about a suspicious vehicle on the side of the highway. When the trooper arrived, he saw the defendant's vehicle on the side of the highway. At the same time, the defendant was inside an ambulance being evaluated by paramedics. The road ranger told the trooper that the defendant was sitting the driver's seat when he arrived. Officers made contact with the defendant and noticed an odor of alcohol, lack of balance, and thick tongued speech. He also had red/bloodshot eyes. He refused to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .243 and .235 in the breath machine.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton filed a pretrial motion to suppress the lawfulness of the arrest. In our motion, we alleged that under Florida Statute 901.15, when there is no crash, an officer must observe every element of a misdemeanor crime "in their presence." Here, the officer did not observe the defendant driving or in actual physical control when he arrived (i.e., the first element of a DUI). A civilian road ranger is not an officer so the fellow officer rule does not apply. After conversations with the State about the legal issue, the DUI was Dismissed.
Result:	The DUI was dismissed.

Feb 11, 2025	Case: 24-CT-011598	Judge Valkenburg
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for failing to maintain a single lane (i.e. weaving). Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech and bloodshot eyes. He also had fumbling fingers and exaggerated movements. Alcohol was found all over the car. He then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .088 and .088 in the breath machine.
Defense:	Due to the .02 margin of error in the breath machine, we were able to place both breath results below the legal limit. After several negotiations regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 11, 2025	Case: 24-CT-011598	Judge Valkenburg
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for failing to maintain a single lane (i.e. weaving). Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech and bloodshot eyes. He also had fumbling fingers and exaggerated movements. Alcohol was found all over the car. He then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .088 and .088 in the breath machine.
Defense:	Due to the .02 margin of error in the breath machine, we were able to place both breath results below the legal limit. After several negotiations regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 10, 2025	Case: 24-CT-502312	Judge Gonzalez
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving, running a red light, and having a defective headlight. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, a disheveled look, she appeared confused, and had bloodshot eyes. Alcohol was found all over the car. The defendant performed very poorly on the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 10, 2025	Case: 24-CT-502019	Judge Gill
Facts:	Police responded to a call regarding a drunk pedestrian (i.e. the defendant) that was stumbling around the restaurant parking lot trying to find his car and opening random car doors. Officers arrived and parked behind the defendant who was now in the driver's seat of his car. Officers knocked on the window and he rolled it down in response to their command. They noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and he appeared unsteady. The defendant stated he had drank two glasses of wine. He performed very poorly on field sobriety tests such as the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, finger to nose, and one leg stand. The walk and turn was actually terminated due to safety concerns as the defendant almost fell over. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .170 and .164 in the breath machine. This was the defendant's Third DUI.
Defense:	Since the caller was anonymous, the officers needed to have some type of corroboration of the defendant's intoxication in order to lawfully seize him. Here, the unlawful seizure, without corroboration, was blocking his car in and ordering him to roll down his window. Officers observed nothing prior to their actions. After conversations with the State regarding the actions by police, they Dropped his Third DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 10, 2025	Case: 24-CT-502844	Judge Gonzalez
Facts:	The defendant crashed his car into a concrete light pole. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and a sway to his stance. He also appeared unsteady, had bloodshot eyes, and dilated pupils. He refused to perform any roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	EMS was on scene and told the officers that the defendant appeared alert, oriented, answered all questions appropriately, and had a steady gait. This was all in contradiction to the officers' observations. In addition, the arresting officer stated that he conducted a DUI investigation, yet he never asked the defendant questions such as where he was coming from, where heading too, or if he even had a drink. He did not ask one question. After negotiations, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 10, 2025	Case: 24-CT-502312	Judge Gonzalez
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving, running a red light, and having a defective headlight. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, a disheveled look, she appeared confused, and had bloodshot eyes. Alcohol was found all over the car. The defendant performed very poorly on the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 10, 2025	Case: 24-CT-502019	Judge Gill
Facts:	Police responded to a call regarding a drunk pedestrian (i.e. the defendant) that was stumbling around the restaurant parking lot trying to find his car and opening random car doors. Officers arrived and parked behind the defendant who was now in the driver's seat of his car. Officers knocked on the window and he rolled it down in response to their command. They noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and he appeared unsteady. The defendant stated he had drank two glasses of wine. He performed very poorly on field sobriety tests such as the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, finger to nose, and one leg stand. The walk and turn was actually terminated due to safety concerns as the defendant almost fell over. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .170 and .164 in the breath machine. This was the defendant's Third DUI.
Defense:	Since the caller was anonymous, the officers needed to have some type of corroboration of the defendant's intoxication in order to lawfully seize him. Here, the unlawful seizure, without corroboration, was blocking his car in and ordering him to roll down his window. Officers observed nothing prior to their actions. After conversations with the State regarding the actions by police, they Dropped his Third DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 10, 2025	Case: 24-CT-502844	Judge Gonzalez
Facts:	The defendant crashed his car into a concrete light pole. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and a sway to his stance. He also appeared unsteady, had bloodshot eyes, and dilated pupils. He refused to perform any roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	EMS was on scene and told the officers that the defendant appeared alert, oriented, answered all questions appropriately, and had a steady gait. This was all in contradiction to the officers' observations. In addition, the arresting officer stated that he conducted a DUI investigation, yet he never asked the defendant questions such as where he was coming from, where heading too, or if he even had a drink. He did not ask one question. After negotiations, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 5, 2025	Case: 24-CT-012794	Judge Taylor
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving and nearly striking a vehicle. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant stated that he had consumed several drinks prior to driving. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	Many observations before and during the field sobriety tests written by the officer were contradicted by the video tape. After negotiations, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 5, 2025	Case: 24-CT-503201	Judge Paluck
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for having tinted windows too dark under Florida Law. Officers did not smell any alcohol, but noticed bloodshot eyes, an odor of burnt marijuana coming from the truck, bloodshot/watery eyes, and white foam on his lips. Believing that he was impaired by drugs, he was requested to perform field sobriety tests. He then performed the HGN (eye test), estimation of 30 seconds, finger to nose, walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. According to the officer, he performed poorly and was arrested for DUI. He later provided a urine sample which revealed positive results from FDLE for marijuana and cocaine. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense:	Even though he tested positive for nonprescribed illegal drugs, the State still must prove that he was impaired. On tape, none of the defendant's normal faculties were impaired. In fact, the arresting officer can be heard on tape stating that he needed a DRE (drug recognition expert) to be sure that the defendant was impaired by the drugs. Well, no DRE was ever called. So, if the cop is not sure, then how can a jury convict? After conversations with the State, they Dismissed the Defendant's Second DUI.
Result:	The DUI was dismissed.

Feb 5, 2025	Case: 24-CT-018325	Judge Gutman
Facts:	The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end traffic crash. When officers arrived, they noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. He also appeared confused, had a blank/dazed stare, exhibited poor balance, and had a lethargic appearance. He admitted to consuming a couple of beers. He refused to perform field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the Defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 5, 2025	Case: 24-CT-018325	Judge Gutman
Facts:	The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end traffic crash. When officers arrived, they noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. He also appeared confused, had a blank/dazed stare, exhibited poor balance, and had a lethargic appearance. He admitted to consuming a couple of beers. He refused to perform field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the Defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 5, 2025	Case: 24-CT-503201	Judge Paluck
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for having tinted windows too dark under Florida Law. Officers did not smell any alcohol, but noticed bloodshot eyes, an odor of burnt marijuana coming from the truck, bloodshot/watery eyes, and white foam on his lips. Believing that he was impaired by drugs, he was requested to perform field sobriety tests. He then performed the HGN (eye test), estimation of 30 seconds, finger to nose, walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. According to the officer, he performed poorly and was arrested for DUI. He later provided a urine sample which revealed positive results from FDLE for marijuana and cocaine. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense:	Even though he tested positive for nonprescribed illegal drugs, the State still must prove that he was impaired. On tape, none of the defendant's normal faculties were impaired. In fact, the arresting officer can be heard on tape stating that he needed a DRE (drug recognition expert) to be sure that the defendant was impaired by the drugs. Well, no DRE was ever called. So, if the cop is not sure, then how can a jury convict? After conversations with the State, they Dismissed the Defendant's Second DUI.
Result:	The DUI was dismissed.

Feb 5, 2025	Case: 24-CT-012794	Judge Taylor
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving and nearly striking a vehicle. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant stated that he had consumed several drinks prior to driving. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	Many observations before and during the field sobriety tests written by the officer were contradicted by the video tape. After negotiations, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 4, 2025	Case: 24-CT-502497	Judge Swett
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. She then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. She was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	The firm announced ready for trial. After negotiations with the prosecutor, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 4, 2025	Case: 24-CT-013096	Judge Scott
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for swerving, making a wide turn into oncoming traffic, and running a stop sign. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and red/glassy eyes. After allegedly performing poorly on field sobriety tests such as the HGN (eye test), one leg stand, and walk and turn, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the Defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

« prev 1 2 3 4 … 363 next »

OBTAIN IMMEDIATE LEGAL HELP

To save your license, you must act within 10 days. Get in touch with our firm by calling 904.450.5220, or fill out the form here.

OBTAIN IMMEDIATE LEGAL HELP

To save your license, you must act within 10 days. Get in touch with our firm by calling 904.450.5220, or fill out the form here.

DUI

PRACTICE

AREAS

I BLEW OVER A 0.08
CAN I WIN MY CASE?

Knowing your rights when being arrested can be the key to a favorable outcome to your case.

WHY HIRE
PARKS & BRAXTON,PA?

With over 4 decades of experience on both sides of the law, we offer strategies for a solid defense

YOU ONLY HAVE 10 DAYS TO GET YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE BACK

Get you free case evaluation from one of our attorneys within minutes.

Offices Located Throughout the State of Florida

Call
Email
Map
Menu