Parks & Braxton, PA: Miami DUI Lawyer | Criminal Defense | DUI Wins

OUR RECENT DUI VICTORIES

The following is a list of the firm’s most recent DUI wins. Parks & Braxton provides the case number, the judge’s name, as well as the date the DUI was won for authenticity purposes.

Feb 4, 2025	Case: 24-CT-002631CTAXMX	Judge Hitzemann
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding and weaving. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant stated that she had consumed five drinks while working in the yard earlier in the day. The defendant refused to perform roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test. This was her Second DUI.
Defense:	On tape, the defendant's speech sounded normal and not slurred. She had no balance issues and was very responsive and coherent. After negotiations with the prosecutor, the State Dropped her Second DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 4, 2025	Case: 24-CT-502497	Judge Swett
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. She then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. She was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	The firm announced ready for trial. After negotiations with the prosecutor, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 4, 2025	Case: 24-CT-013096	Judge Scott
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for swerving, making a wide turn into oncoming traffic, and running a stop sign. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and red/glassy eyes. After allegedly performing poorly on field sobriety tests such as the HGN (eye test), one leg stand, and walk and turn, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the Defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 4, 2025	Case: 24-CT-002631CTAXMX	Judge Hitzemann
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding and weaving. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant stated that she had consumed five drinks while working in the yard earlier in the day. The defendant refused to perform roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test. This was her Second DUI.
Defense:	On tape, the defendant's speech sounded normal and not slurred. She had no balance issues and was very responsive and coherent. After negotiations with the prosecutor, the State Dropped her Second DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 30, 2025	Case: 24-CT-019490	Judge Bonavita
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol and he stated he had consumed two vodkas. He had bloodshot eyes and slurred speech. He performed poorly on the field sobriety tests such as the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .207 and .194 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 30, 2025	Case: 23-CT-021608	Judge Bonavita
Facts:	Police dispatch was notified regarding a sick person passed out in a lane of travel. EMS found the defendant passed out in the car with it still in drive. Upon trying to awake the defendant, he tried to drive off with an EMS worker hanging on for almost 300 feet. Police arrived and noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and slurred speech. He refused to perform field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	When the DUI officer arrived, the defendant was already detained in handcuffs. The firm took a pretrial deposition of the first officer on scene. He stated that he was not the one who cuffed the defendant and did not know the officer's name who did. The firm then raised an issue with the State that the defendant was unlawfully detained and cuffed for no reason as no-one could explain why he was in handcuffs prior the DUI officer's arrival.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 30, 2025	Case: 24-CT-019490	Judge Bonavita
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol and he stated he had consumed two vodkas. He had bloodshot eyes and slurred speech. He performed poorly on the field sobriety tests such as the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .207 and .194 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 30, 2025	Case: 23-CT-021608	Judge Bonavita
Facts:	Police dispatch was notified regarding a sick person passed out in a lane of travel. EMS found the defendant passed out in the car with it still in drive. Upon trying to awake the defendant, he tried to drive off with an EMS worker hanging on for almost 300 feet. Police arrived and noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and slurred speech. He refused to perform field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	When the DUI officer arrived, the defendant was already detained in handcuffs. The firm took a pretrial deposition of the first officer on scene. He stated that he was not the one who cuffed the defendant and did not know the officer's name who did. The firm then raised an issue with the State that the defendant was unlawfully detained and cuffed for no reason as no-one could explain why he was in handcuffs prior the DUI officer's arrival.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 29, 2025	Case: 24-CT-018256	Judge Griner
Facts:	A named citizen called police and stated that the defendant was swerving all over the road and cut him off. Officers conducted a traffic stop and observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. After performing various field sobriety tests such as the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew .189 and .182 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, they Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 29, 2025	Case: 24-CT-018256	Judge Griner
Facts:	A named citizen called police and stated that the defendant was swerving all over the road and cut him off. Officers conducted a traffic stop and observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. After performing various field sobriety tests such as the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew .189 and .182 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, they Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 28, 2025	Case: 24-CT-002821	Judge K. Roberts
Facts:	The defendant crashed his car into the center median and then a fence. There was heavy front-end damage to his car. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol and watery/glassy eyes. He then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	Prior to trial, the firm pointed out to the State that on tape, his speech was normal, he was responsive and coherent, polite, and he had no balance issues. In addition, his field sobriety tests were much better on tape than as described in the police reports.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 28, 2025	Case: 24-CT-002821	Judge K. Roberts
Facts:	The defendant crashed his car into the center median and then a fence. There was heavy front-end damage to his car. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol and watery/glassy eyes. He then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	Prior to trial, the firm pointed out to the State that on tape, his speech was normal, he was responsive and coherent, polite, and he had no balance issues. In addition, his field sobriety tests were much better on tape than as described in the police reports.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 23, 2025	Case: 24-CT-001584CTAXWS	Judge Swett
Facts:	Police were called to a McDonalds regarding drunk patron (i.e., the defendant). When police arrived, they came into contact with the defendant and smelled alcohol, observed slurred speech, and had an inability to walk without swaying. No one could find the keys to the car as the defendant had discarded them before the cops arrived. In a jail call later to his mother, he stated that he hid them. Officers went into McDonalds and saw the video of him behind the wheel. He refused to do roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	Under Florida Statute 901.15, when there is no crash, an officer must observe every element of a misdemeanor crime "in their presence." Here, the officer did not observe the defendant driving or in actual physical control when he arrived (i.e., the first element of a DUI). Watching him on a McDonalds video is not in his presence. Thus, he did not observe the first element of DUI so the arrest was unlawful. After conversations with the State about the legal issue, the DUI was Dropped.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 23, 2025	Case: 24-CT-002005CTAXWS	Judge Grey
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for swerving, drifting in his lane, rapidly accelerating, following too closely, and almost striking another car. Officers observed an odor of alcohol and he admitted to consuming four beers. He also had slurred speech, dry mouth, watery eyes, and he made unusual/inconsistent statements. He was also unsteady and swayed while he stood. After performing HGN (eye test), the walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After conversations with the prosecutor regarding the defendant and the evidence, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 23, 2025	Case: 24-MM-002668MMAXWS	Judge Grey
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for swerving and failing to maintain her lane. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and she was unsteady. She admitted to having drank alcohol and also stumbled. She refused to perform field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She refused to get into the patrol car and was also charged with resisting an officer without violence. She later refused a breath test.
Defense:	When a defendant refuses to perform field sobriety tests, an officer must advise them of the adverse consequences for refusing. For example, the officer must state something like, "I am going to have base my decision to arrest you on what I have observed so far if you refuse." In addition, the officer can state to the defendant that their refusal can be used against them in court. If they do not give any adverse consequences, the refusal will be excluded from evidence. Here, the officer did not give the defendant any adverse consequences. After negotiations short of trial, the State Dropped the DUI and she received no conviction on the resisting charge.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 23, 2025	Case: 24-CT-001584CTAXWS	Judge Swett
Facts:	Police were called to a McDonalds regarding drunk patron (i.e., the defendant). When police arrived, they came into contact with the defendant and smelled alcohol, observed slurred speech, and had an inability to walk without swaying. No one could find the keys to the car as the defendant had discarded them before the cops arrived. In a jail call later to his mother, he stated that he hid them. Officers went into McDonalds and saw the video of him behind the wheel. He refused to do roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	Under Florida Statute 901.15, when there is no crash, an officer must observe every element of a misdemeanor crime "in their presence." Here, the officer did not observe the defendant driving or in actual physical control when he arrived (i.e., the first element of a DUI). Watching him on a McDonalds video is not in his presence. Thus, he did not observe the first element of DUI so the arrest was unlawful. After conversations with the State about the legal issue, the DUI was Dropped.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 23, 2025	Case: 24-CT-002005CTAXWS	Judge Grey
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for swerving, drifting in his lane, rapidly accelerating, following too closely, and almost striking another car. Officers observed an odor of alcohol and he admitted to consuming four beers. He also had slurred speech, dry mouth, watery eyes, and he made unusual/inconsistent statements. He was also unsteady and swayed while he stood. After performing HGN (eye test), the walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After conversations with the prosecutor regarding the defendant and the evidence, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 23, 2025	Case: 24-MM-002668MMAXWS	Judge Grey
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for swerving and failing to maintain her lane. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and she was unsteady. She admitted to having drank alcohol and also stumbled. She refused to perform field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She refused to get into the patrol car and was also charged with resisting an officer without violence. She later refused a breath test.
Defense:	When a defendant refuses to perform field sobriety tests, an officer must advise them of the adverse consequences for refusing. For example, the officer must state something like, "I am going to have base my decision to arrest you on what I have observed so far if you refuse." In addition, the officer can state to the defendant that their refusal can be used against them in court. If they do not give any adverse consequences, the refusal will be excluded from evidence. Here, the officer did not give the defendant any adverse consequences. After negotiations short of trial, the State Dropped the DUI and she received no conviction on the resisting charge.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 22, 2025	Case: 24-CT-011540	Judge Bagge-Hernandez
Facts:	The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end traffic crash. Witnesses stated that she was driving at a high rate of speed and cutting across lanes of traffic prior to the accident. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and watery eyes. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, she was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 22, 2025	Case: 24-CT-013463	Judge Taylor
Facts:	The defendant drove up to officers as they were on an unrelated traffic stop/crash scene. Officers approached him and noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. He also urinated on himself and had an unsteady stance. He refused to perform roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the defendant and the evidence, they Dropped his Second DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

« prev 1 2 3 4 5 … 363 next »

OBTAIN IMMEDIATE LEGAL HELP

To save your license, you must act within 10 days. Get in touch with our firm by calling 904.450.5220, or fill out the form here.

OBTAIN IMMEDIATE LEGAL HELP

To save your license, you must act within 10 days. Get in touch with our firm by calling 904.450.5220, or fill out the form here.

DUI

PRACTICE

AREAS

I BLEW OVER A 0.08
CAN I WIN MY CASE?

Knowing your rights when being arrested can be the key to a favorable outcome to your case.

WHY HIRE
PARKS & BRAXTON,PA?

With over 4 decades of experience on both sides of the law, we offer strategies for a solid defense

YOU ONLY HAVE 10 DAYS TO GET YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE BACK

Get you free case evaluation from one of our attorneys within minutes.

Offices Located Throughout the State of Florida

Call
Email
Map
Menu